amtrak-official

We wouldn't have such a hard time building and funding infrastructure if it was covered in Neon colors and cool shapes instead of just being grey concrete

amtrak-official

Why you ask? Simple both Federal Officials and Investors are like small children, they are drawn to bright colors like moths to a flame

amtrak-official

Also because I want us to make bridges bright fucking pink or green because it would be fun

got-no-skill

You're not wrong in that it would get people's attention, however:

I can see so many unironic headlines like this.

amtrak-official

[Image ID: A train with a rainbow pride livery crosses a stone bridge. In the lower corner is a caption labeled "The God damn News: Obama Put Chemicals in the Diesel turned the trains gay" next to the caption is a question mark in a diamond]

What would make a neon yellow Bridge get viewed as any more queer than any other bridge exactly?

belugalord

Conservatives need something to be mad about this week, plus they need some excuse to block public infrastructure bills. To them any change is scary, even a change as small as the colors of bridges.

that said, maintaining the paint on bridges would be a somewhat costly and dangerous job, so for practical reasons i think we can leave them whatever color they are. the trains themselves would be super easy to paint though, we must do this immediately

amtrak-official

Actually there is a practical reason to paint bridges, it is done to slow down rusting!!