So do people realize that we aren't building new train tracks when we expand the amteak network, I have multiple times seen people say that we shouldn't expand the network because it would destroy protected lands, which would be a fair criticism but Amtrak doesn't build new tracks, we use existing tracks. We are not destroying protected lands, we are using land that has already been clear for a century
Also the alternative is more highways which destroy significantly more land for less capacity than railways. So the question is do you want to keep complaining about something that isn't happening and let the environment get damaged as a result or do you want to actually learn how things work
So, wait... Were the tracks not in use at all? Or was it like *only* commercial transport on those tracks? Either way, its good that amtrak will be able to use them again, but one would be much more frustrating
Almost all rail tracks in the US are either abandoned or only used for freight rail at the moment
Jesus, we really have no excuse for having such a lackluster rail system, do we?
Sure we do! The US government hate both rail and you personally
I hate arguments like this. why do more environmentally friendly solutions always have to be 100% flawless when their current counterparts are so much worse?
can't expand railroads because that would be damaging. better keep expanding highways and taking airplanes everywhere.
can't use solar panels or electric batteries because of the dangerous chemicals and mining practices. better keep burning oil and coal.
can't grow almonds because they use too much water. better keep eating beef and dairy.
Because Perfect is the enemy of good and we have decided to strive for a perfect world instead of a better one. Despite the impossibility of a perfect world