The reason that cities produce so much less carbon despite having so many people is because there is less driving and more centralized power, the least carbon emitting places are cities with clean energy and an urban tree canopy as well as decent public transiy
Suburbs are inherently inefficient and polluting due to their low density and large homes that make for places that need massive amounts of energy to exist and they waste enormous amounts heating and cooling homes due to the size and as the homes are spread out energy gets lost in the movement of the energy meaning more needs to be produced compounding the issues
This is interesting, but I find the core conceit of the study a little odd. Not sure why a carbon tax would be applied to households and not the manufacturers that are actually doing the emissions.
The power of the individual doesn’t really mean much in the climate change sphere. The action of an individual is nothing compared to the industry around them, so policy should be aimed there instead.
I agree with that wholeheartedly, I was simply using this study to try and illustrate a point about broader US urban planning
I'm not sure what corn has to do with this other than the high-carbon-producing areas growing a lot of it, could you explain? Not trying to be an asshole here, I genuinely don't understand.
The corn bit was mainly a joke, but corn is the main crop used in industrial monoculture farming which is incredibly ecologically harmful and gas intensive due to the massive amounts of land that need to be farmed requiring large machinery







